Skip to main content

Do you think the response of the Polish society and government to the coronavirus epidemic has been appropriate?

In recent months, the world has literally turned upside down. Each country tries its best to provide citizens with the best care and support during this difficult period. It was just a matter of time for the coronavirus pandemic to reach Poland. The Polish government took precautionary measures very early; they kept society informed about the impending threat to give time to prepare and make everybody more cautious. This allowed many people to stock up on food, medicines and other necessary things for upcoming time. After first identified cases administration decided to close schools and most of the public places to reduce contact and avoid gathering. Also the borders were closed and all the flights were canceled. Furthermore, the government secure return flights for citizens staying outside the country. Because of the news reporting more and more new cases and even several deaths many people started to panic. Not to say that some do the opposite by regular going out and meeting each other. During this tough period we should take special care of our health - not only for ourselves but also for the others. Remember that even though you have no symptoms of disease, you can spread it. Especially elderly people are particularly vulnerable because of their weak immune system and other illnesses. It is really hard to say what is right and what is wrong in this whole new situation however our government makes every effort not to repeat the mistakes of others.

Comments

  1. Wow, this is well beyond the 100-word limit! However, have you really answered the question, especially its second part? Parts of your text look like advice to all of us rather than an opinion on whether what we as a society are doing is reasonable.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin

Everyone has heard that name once in their lives. Bitcoin is undeniably the most famous cryptocurrency in the world. It was created in 2009 by an anonymous creator hiding their identity under the pseudonym known as Satoshi Nakamoto. Since then, an unknown founder and their $64 billion stake, has long been a point of major interest, especially as their personal wealth continues to grow. From the time it was created, Bitcoin has experienced significant highs and lows - in the past year, the currency has risen over 400%. As of today, one bitcoin is worth about $40,000. The mystery behind such a success may lie in the fact that it was the first cryptocurrency to ever exist and the first using blockchain technology. Bitcoin has not only been a trendsetter, ushering in a wave of cryptocurrencies built on a decentralised peer-to-peer network, but has also become the de facto standard for them, inspiring an ever growing legion of followers and spinoffs. In addition, one of the first tangible i...

What is Cryptocurrency?

To put it simply, cryptocurrency is a medium of exchange digital money that is encrypted and decentralised. It is based on blockchain technology which is a system of recording information in a way that makes it difficult or impossible to change. The fact that it is decentralised means there is no central authority that manages and maintains the value of the cryptocurrency - unlike the U.S Dollar or the Euro. You can use it to buy regular goods and services, although most people invest in it like they do in stocks or precious metals. Everyone can purchase cryptocurrency on peer-to-peer networks and cryptocurrency exchanges, such as Coinbase and Bitfinex; however, investing in it might be risky due to its intense price swings and system differences. Keep in mind to not invest more money than you can afford to lose. There are more than 5,000 different cryptos in circulation and the most popular ones are Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin. Some people even refer to it as 'digital gold'...

The rose phenomenon

When I was on holiday at the seaside with my friends there was a lady that every evening walked around the city and sold roses. What was unconventional is that she was offering the flowers only to the couples or when she saw a man and a woman together. The lady was taking advantage of men feeling pressure of making a good impression on women and usually decided to buy the rose. It is my belief that the lady selling flowers acted inequitable offering them only to the couples. Furthermore, getting leverage over a man feeling guilty for not buying the rose because 'it is appropriate' is damaging for the society and could be linked with the toxic masculinity. It should be someone's choice whether they want to gift their loved ones and especially with what or when. Also receiving a flower because of the forced situation like that must feel awkward and uncomfortable. I believe that if we want to move forward as a society we have to banish stereotypes from our everyday life.